.

.

Thursday, 17 January 2013

The Most Famous Holocaust Photo a Fraud



Just over a month ago, I posted an article in which I asserted that arguably the most famous Holocaust photo of all, has been doctored. A version of the above photograph appeared in The New York Times Magazine on page 42 of the Sunday, May 6th, 1945 edition, without the naked gentleman by the post on the right of the photograph.

In that previous article I was relying on a copy I'd purchased and downloaded from The New York Times online archive. And it is an awful copy. So since then I have been endeavouring to track down a better copy of this photo, and this morning I finally succeeded. But it's been a lot of effort, and ended-up costing me over a (U.S.) $100. I first brought an original copy of the May 6th, 1945 edition of The New York Times, which arrived without the magazine section, I visited the National Art Library in London with the deluded belief they had a copy, I contacted the Library of Congress, who I must say were amazingly helpful, and provided me with several copies from the micro-film records they hold (unfortunately another terrible copy), but eventually I found a copy of the magazine on eBay! It was listed with the incorrect date, but as the Library of Congress had provided me with a copy of the front cover of the May 6th, 1945 edition, I knew it was the one I was after. I quickly paid for it, and have been eagerly awaiting its arrival.

I think you'll agree (unless you're a Ho£ocaust profiteer), that it's been well-worth the effort:


Cover of Section 1 of The New York Times, Sunday, May 6th, 1945 (enlarged)


Cover of The New York Times Magazine, Sunday, May 6th, 1945 (enlarged)


The New York Times Magazine, Sunday, May 6th, 1945, pp.42-43. (enlarged)

The New York Times Magazine, Sunday, May 6th, 1945, p.42. (enlarged)


The New York Times Magazine, Sunday, May 6th, 1945, p.42. (Scanned copy, enlarged)

The New York Times Magazine, Sunday, May 6th, 1945, p.42. (Scanned copy, enlarged)


As Eric Hunt pointed out, the man who has been doctored into this photo, does appear in other photos taken at Buchenwald.



Update: January 19, 2013, 14:05 GMT


A friend has created these superb gif images by overlaying my photograph of the Buchenwald photo published in the NYT magazine in 1945, and the official version of the photo held by the U.S. National Archives (no.178 on this list). 







Update: April 15, 2013, 23:05 GMT



enlarged

Above are copies of Auschwitz and Buchenwald survivor Mel Mermelstein's book By Bread Alone: The Story of A-4685 first published in 1979. The copy on the left is a 1981 revised edition, and the other a 1991 reprint.
Inside both of these books (again the 1981 edition is on the left in the photo below), the doctored version of the photo features in a facsimile of part of the Los Angeles Times, April 29, 1945, p.3, which is the earliest publication of this photo (doctored or undoctored) I have so far either found or been able to confirm (see bottom of this post).

enlarged



Update: April 24, 2013, 22:45 GMT




Here's some footage of me flicking through this edition of the NYT Magazine.



84 comments:

  1. Black Rabbit, you rock star!

    Absolutely f**********************************ing brilliant!

    ReplyDelete
  2. Outstanding work. This is huge.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The photo does not pan far back enough on the photos to see if the alleged photoshopped man was there in the original or not. I call fail.
      Support this website and other revisionists, but let us star with real proof.

      Delete
    2. Your argument doesn't even make any sense. I call fail on your fail call.

      Delete
    3. The trouble is that the fail call is based on your enlargements of photo on page 42 of the NYT Magazine, which do cut off the man in question. If the commenter just scrolls up to your scan of both pages 42 and 43, which show the photo in its entirety, the reason given for the fail call quickly falls away.

      Delete
    4. The NYT photo cuts of the area where his feet and ankles were, but the not the area where 95% (approx) of his body should be.

      His argument doesn't make sense, as the magazine is an inanimate object. If I'd have taken a pan photo of it, it would just be blurred.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Panning_(camera)

      Delete
  3. This is fantastic! Thank you! I will spread the news as much as I can.

    ReplyDelete
  4. One more in the gas-chamber, VERY SAD!

    ReplyDelete
  5. Thank you very much for the time and money you invest to debunk the holo-forgeries. Great job.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Great find, outstanding research.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Interesting. Poor bastards crammed on the bunks still had a tough time though didn't they?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. A common problem with POWS throught the world what?

      Delete
  8. Great job by getting the truth out there!!

    What the picture shows is that prisoners had a rough time due to the lack of food during the end of the war - JUST LIKE THE GERMANS! This due to the allied forces bombing of gGrmany, not because of the national socialist regime.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Exactly. When you are in a war, you're going to make damn certain your Forces eat first. Then your prisoners. Hell, the glorious German Folk were starving too!! It's a jacked-up situation but it's one that has held true for centuries. I love this find!! Btw, have any of yall checked these guys out? Great movie!! All facts are accurate (as we know them to be). Go check 'em out and send 'em some love! http://trutube.tv/user/TGSNTtv

      Delete
  9. I posted a comment on here when you posted the picture from The New York Times, and I was skeptical.

    ...but I guess I was wrong. This is an amazing find! Wow.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Excellent research, I sincerely appreciate your sacrifice and persistence for truth...journey well...

    ReplyDelete
  11. Why do you have to be so f...ing AWESOME????

    DAMN YOU!!!

    ReplyDelete
  12. I would make a donation to support your work, if possible. Because it´s B - R - I - it´s dynamite...

    ReplyDelete
  13. Well worth the effort IS AN UNDERstatement!

    Three Cheers for this amazing Rabbit!


    “One of the saddest lessons of history is this:
    IF we’ve been bamboozled long enough,
    we tend to reject any evidence of the bamboozle.

    We’re no longer interested in finding
    out THE TRUTH.

    The bamboozle has capture us.

    It is simply too painful to acknowledge -
    even to ourselves, that we’ve been so credulous.”

    - Carl Edward Sagan, Jewish American Astronomer

    ReplyDelete
  14. The "Holocaust" - the original modern era PSYOP, complete with fake photos, fake "victims" and "eye witnesses", fake sob stories, fake video, etc etc. It's all fake. Can you believe the nerve of these people? It's incredible when you step back and look at it.

    Thanks for your research!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Mounting the Holohoax won them a country.
      Staging 911 gave them The World.

      Delete
    2. back in the seventies I caught an old woman around the corner holding onions up to her eyes so she could do the holocaust song and dance routine for the cameras

      Delete
    3. Not all the eye witnesses are fake. I believe the holocaust survivor eye witness testimonials about how each day, one prisoner was selected to be put into a cage where with a wild eagle and a wild bear, and would be torn apart. I believe the one about how each day, the camp commandant's wife would come and personally select a prisoner from which to make a lampshade for her. (Though i do wonder why she needed so many lampshades?) I believe the testimony of one survivor that as a child, she escaped the camp into the surrounding wilderness where she was raised by a pack of wolves.

      There's no such thing as a "good jew". They all have to go. Jews out of the U.S. now! It's a matter of survival.

      Delete
  15. This is great stuff, but one of the beams holding up the bunk doesn't reach the ground in the NY Times version of the photo. The angles on the beams that were obscured by the standing man look odd, too. The NY Times version is of lower quality.

    I feel the naked guy was burned and dodged out of this NY times version of the photo using lightroom techniques, as others have said, maybe to protect the sensibilities of the public. (How often even today does the press hide the brutal reality of war and death in newspapers).

    Then there is the fact that the standing man appears in the very next numbered photograph. Why fake it when he was right there to stand up and get in the shot?

    ReplyDelete
  16. so please tell me did my grandmother tattoo her id# on her own arm? the scars on her back from the SS Man whipping her were fake as well? her brothers and sisters have been in hiding for 60 years and are not really dead?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yes, your grandmother is telling you fables. Get over it. No one believes the fairy tales you Jews tell anymore.

      Delete
    2. I too have seen the tatoos and I believe they were real. But the numbers, severity of events and incidents have been unrestrainedly enhanced, fabricated spun. Its not 100% lie- that is what makes for the most powerful agitprop of all.

      Delete
    3. Ask Elie the lying weasel Weisel about his tattoos while you are at it...

      Nope.. 100% lies and fabrications.. But your Kol Nidre gives you the penchance for lying, doesn't it?

      Delete
    4. Yes...just look at it like you would a wild and frisky dream

      Delete
    5. Boo hoo. So your grandma jew got a tattoo on her arm. Just as the German SS had their bloodtype tattooed under their arm. The fact she was in a work camp as a potential subversive, which she was by virtue of being a jew, does not mean the sick Jew lies about shrunken heads, human fat soap, cyanide gas chambers, mass execution steam chambers, vacuum chambers, electrified floor chambers, human skin lampshades and the rest of the twisted Jewish fantasies have any basis in reality.

      Delete
  17. "so please tell me did my grandmother tattoo her id# on her own arm? the scars on her back from the SS Man whipping her were fake as well? her brothers and sisters have been in hiding for 60 years and are not really dead?"

    Your grandmother's tattoo only proves she worked in a Nazi camp. What's the problem with that? I know Jews don't like to work but we are not going to cry for centuries because your sweet granny had to perform forced labor during a few years (like so many people during WW2).

    Grandma was whipped? What for? Do you realize the camp guards were not allowed to punish inmates without asking for permission in Oranienbug HQ. Even the number of allowed lashes was written on the form allowing or not those punishments.

    Grandma's brothers and sisters died during WW2? So what? Many people, jews and gentiles, died during WW2. It doesn't mean they were killed. I bet they died from typhus.

    ReplyDelete
  18. please explain the einsatzgruppen and their genocidal trek following the advancing nazi beasts on the eastern front. the commander of one of the einsatzgruppen TESTIFIED ON THE STAND AND ADMITTED HIS CRIMES. HE WAS LYING IN ORDER TO COMMIT SUICIDE BY HAVING HIS NAZI NECK STRETCHED BY THE CORD OF JUSTICE I GUESS.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The Einsatzgruppen myth is totally debunked here:

      http://www.natallnews.com/story.php?id=3097

      Delete
    2. Do you mean Otto Ohlendorf?

      The US prosecutor at his trial, Benjamin B. Ferencz (Jewish), admitted to being present when Jews burnt a German alive in a crematory oven.
      http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/07/21/AR2005072101680_5.html

      Delete
    3. john friend you link to a NEO-NAZI WEBSITE as historical proof that the einsatzgruppen was a myth. THAT'S RICH! Work will make you free friend!

      Rabbit..... yes i was referring to ohlendorf. SO WHAT. That nazi got what he deserved.


      Why would the fellow admit to burning down the reichstag when it was obvious that the national socialists were to blame?

      Delete
    4. "Why would the fellow admit to burning down the reichstag when it was obvious that the national socialists were to blame?"

      Oh dear. You really shouldn't listen to Alex Jones.

      Delete
    5. Such testimonies are worthless. You ask sarcastically if he lied in order to get himself hanged. No. But he probably lied to stop the beatings, from having his testicles crushed, from having lit matches forced under his fingernails, or his family threatened, all of which the Jews who ran the showtrial tribunals were doing to the Germans to get them to confess to anything.

      Delete
  19. Rabbit I don't listen to alex jones i acquired an EDUCATION which seems to be sorely lacking in this generation of jackbooted fascists. funny because many of the RIGHTEOUSLY EXECUTED nazi's whose decayed schmeckles you intellectual nitwits wish to nuzzle were educated men. like the aforementioned ohlendorf.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Which historians still maintain that the Nazis burnt the Reichstag? Cite exact sources.

      These guys are heroes to you evidently. Giving nazis what they deserve.
      http://collections.yadvashem.org/photosarchive/en-us/31793.html

      Delete
  20. ABSOLUTELY! Collaboration with PURE EVIL has its costs.


    William Shirer is one historian off the top of my head.

    ReplyDelete
  21. perhaps.....but i know enough about insurgent warfare to know that when one operates without a uniform and the protections afforded to combatants and with summary execution without trial as the punishment for said partisan activity that one tends to give as good as one gets.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. as usual those standards only apply to goy. when its the jews getting retaliated against for their crimes? its perennial persecution whining and 'innocent' victimhood attacked. lets see that standard applied to Greenspans & Geithners and let the kvetching begin.

      Delete
  22. Black Rabbit

    I stand up and salute You, mate.

    Jerzy

    ReplyDelete
  23. Come back to RODOH, you coward. Or was the humiliation too much? Are you busy doing "research" actually to find out something about your "discovery"? Get your ass back to RODOH for another drubbing, guppy!

    Wolf Mann

    ReplyDelete
  24. Winston Smith is a cowardly chimp who tried to debate at Rodoh and got the living sh*t kicked out of him. He'd prefer to stay here and have his d*ck s*cked by wannabe Nazi retards like Joe Friend. Once humiliated at Rodoh, Winston Smith ran like h*ll and got the f8ck out of there. Come back, p*ssy, and face the medicine.

    Best wishes,
    Bernard

    ReplyDelete
  25. Winston Smith is a cowardly sack of sh*t who ran from rodoh after being humiliated. Come back and take the medicine, punk. WS prefers to have his d*ck s*cked by wannabe Nazi filth like joe friend and konsl

    Best wishes
    Bernard

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. RETARD,
      Oh, I mean Bernard -

      The case clearly is made from your own JUvenile posts that you are incapable of carrying on intelligent conversation as you can NOT type once sentence together without hurling your ad hominem attacks.

      Do you seriously think that has meaning here?
      GROW UP - this isn't high-school
      no "thinking" person is moved by slimy SMEAR tactics which only demonstrates YOU HAVE NOTHING to say.

      Move along now - Go an worship your Holocaust Religion of HATE-
      but take a good LONG look in the mirror sometime today-

      The only NAZI - NAtional ZIonist -
      lurking here
      IS YOU.

      Have a nice day NA-ZI.

      Delete
  26. Winston Smith represents the next level of exhaustively probing Revisionist research.

    ReplyDelete
  27. Who is this Konsl person and Joe Friend? I have never heard of rodoh. What is it?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. It's a forum where holocaust defenders and holocaust deniers debate and hurl insults about.

      http://forum.rodoh.com/

      Delete
  28. The self same rabbit Winston writer,who posted a picture of a Paedophile Jew and then went very, very silent when he was confronted with post after post about paedo Methodists along with various other kiddy fiddling Christians. Trying to pretend that paedophilia is just the exclusive preserve of Jews is the mark of a Neo Nazi bullshit artist saluted by f*ckwits like Ullicki Rek above.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. No one said all religions werent guilty of pedophilia. Whats interesting is how we never hear in media about the jews' infractions- only Catholic priests.

      Another omission in the jew-owned press is the blatant unequivocal approbation of pedophilia repeatedly in the TALMUD. The finger the Koran for guilt, but havent seen the tractates cited in MSM yet.

      Delete
  29. Winston Smith ran like the chickensh*t coward that he is from the Crazy White thread at rodoh. Get your sorry ass back and be a man. Confront the issue of White Christian Ministers who molest children.

    Best
    Bernard

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Bernard seriously please get your head out of your arse you're almost lobotomized.

      You are the one who has serious "denial" issues. Any intellectually honest individual is fully aware of huge numbers of pedophile predators within The KOSHER community. The Jewish community is just better at covering up theses heinous crimes because they for the most part control the global media.

      Thank GOD for the Awareness Center and the Jewish International Coalition AGAINST Sexual Abuse/Assault helping those who are hurting.

      http://theawarenesscenter.blogspot.com/

      It seems a month can't even go by without another Rabbi getting exposed for their gross perversions.

      Brooklyn Yeshiva Teacher Accused Of Sexually Abusing Teens In Car, Motel Sources Tell 1010 WINS Yoel Malik 33 Used Alcohol & Cigarettes To Lure Victims January 31, 2013
      http://newyork.cbslocal.com/2013/01/31/former-head-of-brooklyn-yeshiva-faces-sex-abuse-charges/

      Delete
    2. Please Bernard, as you sign, why do you write anonymously ?

      I think that Winston Smith nailed your community hard with that picture to make you trolling so offendingly and being so puerile.

      Could you focus on the topic of the page ?

      Delete
  30. The Filth, quoted:


    SANHEDRIN, 55b-55a: "What is meant by this? - Rab said: Pederasty with a child below nine years of age is not deemed as pederasty with a child above that. Samuel said: Pederasty with a child below three years is not treated as with a child above that (2) What is the basis of their dispute? - Rab maintains that only he who is able to engage in sexual intercourse, may, as the passive subject of pederasty throw guilt (upon the actual offender); whilst he who is unable to engage in sexual intercourse cannot be a passive subject of pederasty (in that respect) (3). But Samuel maintains: Scriptures writes, (And thou shalt not lie with mankind) as with the lyings of a woman (4). It has been taught in accordance with Rab: Pederasty at the age of nine years and a day; (55a) (he) who commits bestiality, whether naturally or unnaturally: or a woman who causes herself to be bestiality abused, whether naturally or unnaturally, is liable to punishment (5)."

    This "divine truth" which "a whole people venerate" of which "not a single letter of it is missing" and today "is flourishing to such a degree as cannot be found in its history" is illustrated by the additional verbatim quotations which follow:

    SANHEDRIN, 55b: "A maiden three years and a day may be acquired in marriage by coition, and if her deceased husband's brother cohabits with her, she becomes his. The penalty of adultery may be incurred through her; (if a niddah) she defiles him who has connection with her, so that he in turn defiles that upon which he lies, as a garment which has lain upon (a person afflicted with gonorrhea)."

    (footnotes) "(2) His wife derives no pleasure from this, and hence there is no cleaving. (3) A variant reading of this passage is: Is there anything permitted to a Jew which is forbidden to a heathen. Unnatural connection is permitted to a Jew. (4) By taking the two in conjunction, the latter as illustrating the former, we learn that the guilt of violating the injunction `to his wife but not to his neighbor's wife' is incurred only for natural but not for unnatural intercourse."


    SANHEDRIN, 69b "Our rabbis taught: If a woman sported lewdly with her young son (a minor), and he committed the first stage of cohabitation with her, -Beth Shammai says, he thereby renders her unfit for the priesthood (1). Beth Hillel declares her fit...All agree that the connection of a boy nine years and a day is a real connection; whilst that of one less than eight years is not (2); their dispute refers only to one who is eight years old.


    KETHUBOTH, 11a-11b. "Rabba said, It means (5) this: When a grown up man has intercourse with a little girl it is nothing, for when the girl is less than this (6), it is as if one puts the finger in the eye (7), but when a small boy has intercourse with a grown up woman, he makes her as `a girl who is injured by a piece of wood' ".
    (footnotes) "(5). Lit., `says'. (6) Lit., `here', that is, less than three years old. (7) Tears come to the eyes again and again, so does virginity come back to the little girl under three years."

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. KETHUBOTH, 11a-11b. "Rab Judah said that Rab said: A small boy who has intercourse with a grown up woman makes her (as though she were ) injured by a piece of wood (1). Although the intercourse of a small boy is not regarded as a sexual act, nevertheless the woman is injured by it as by a piece of wood."
      (footnotes) "(1) Although the intercourse of a small boy is not regarded as a sexual act, nevertheless the woman is injured by it as by a piece of wood."

      ABODAH ZARAH, 36b-37a. "R. Naham b. Isaac said: They decreed in connection with a heathen child that it would cause defilement by seminal emission (2) so that an Israelite child should not become accustomed to commit pederasty with it...From what age does a heathen child cause defilement by seminal emission? From the age of nine years and one day. (37a) for inasmuch as he is then capable of the sexual act he likewise defiles by emission. Rabina said: It is therefore to be concluded that a heathen girl (communicates defilement) from the age of three years and one day, for inasmuch as she is then capable of the sexual act she likewise defiles by a flux.

      SOTAH, 26b. "R. Papa said: It excludes an animal, because there is not adultery in connection with an animal (4). Raba of Parazika (5) asked R. Ashi, Whence is the statement which the Rabbis made that there is no adultery in connection with an animal? Because it is written, Thou shalt not bring the hire of a harlot or the wages of a dog etc.; (6) and it has been taught: The hire of a dog (7) and the wages of a harlot (8) are permissible, as it is said, Even both of these (9) - the two (specified texts are abominations) but not four (10)...As lying with mankind. (12) But, said Raba, it excludes the case where he warned her against contact of the bodies (13). Abaye said to him, That is merely an obscene act (and not adultery), and did the All-Merciful prohibit (a wife to her husband) for an obscene act?"

      Delete
  31. Hi winston great stuff check on Abraham gamse
    ( abram games) he was churchills man in charge of fake photos. Sefton delmer wa perhaps the first to prove that trucklaods of bodies were brought in from dresden after the nightmare
    and positioned at the camps for photos, thes epeople were not even jews, as being positioned none were circumcsed ( sexualy mutilated )

    ReplyDelete
  32. How do you know that the photo published in the NYT is not the doctored one, and the photo including the naked man is the real one?

    Don't forget, standards for how much of the human body could be shown in newspapers were different seventy years go.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I don't know that for sure. But IF that was the case, the bunks that an expert in photo manipulation at the NYT had to draw into the photo, look far more realistic than the left arm of the naked man against the pillar.

      Also on page 43, the NYT credits this photo to the 'THE NEW YORK TIMES (U. S. ARMY)' - So we'd also have to accept the paper was happy manipulating photos given to them by the US Army!

      Delete
    2. NOTICE any increased traffic lately??? : D

      Incogman did an article on your research and now you should see increased traffic to your site. (both good and the bad unfortunately) Do have a back-up of your material in-case the rabbid National Zionist NAZI's thoughtpolice get you censored from blogspot?

      Congrats Black Rabbit of Inle

      Here is the article LINK:
      http://incogman.net/2013/02/famous-nyt-holocaust-photo-exposed-as-a-fraud/

      Delete
  33. Desperate Deception: British Covert Operations in the United States, 1939-44

    by Thomas E. Mahl (Washington, D.C.: Brassey’s, 1998); 256 pages
    Book Review by Richard M. Ebeling, November 1998

    This book details how the BRITS and YANKS set up a fake German Concentration Camp on Staten Island to create “news reel” footage depicting “Nazi atrocities” with which to get the American public to support the WAR against Germany.

    This was done in Canada too where fake photos and were created, all to demonize the Germans! But of course, it didn’t stop there when the war ended. Do you recall seeing all this “Nazi atrocity” stuff that they taught you in history class? Do you still think it was all real and all true?

    Dose any "thinking" person still think Goebbels and Hitler were the "big" liars?

    http://justice4germans.wordpress.com/2012/10/31/wwii-uk-and-us-psyops-exposed-still-think-goebbels-and-hitler-were-the-big-fat-liars/comment-page-1/#comment-31

    ReplyDelete
  34. News from Elie Wiesel: French journalist Jean Robin made a phone call to the Auschwitz-Museum to investigate about Wiesel´s number:
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R7FFiZiCA8U

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Elie Weisel is a piece of filth... A lying scumbag that was NEVER at any camp at all.. He stole the identity of a true work camp inmate named Lazar Weisel, and has used that as his false personna ever since...

      He does not even have a tattoo.... There have been many videos and photos that have caught pictures of his arm and there is NO tattoo....

      What a lying sack of goo... And his book of pure fiction "La Nuit" that has been pushed into the minds of our children now for decades..

      Honestly, you Jews make me so sick!

      Delete
    2. I could not agree with you more.

      There was a Hungarian guy who some years back met with Elie Weisel at an airport, expecting to see his old friend Lazar who was with him at that camp. But when Elie showed up, the man said right away he was an imposter.

      I do not remember the Hungarian camp inmate's name. He has even been fighting against Weisel's continuing lying now for years.

      Elie Weisel is a fraud and a perfect example of the Jew Kol Nidre which gives them the ability to lie without any morals to the Gentiles. What a sick group these Jews really are.

      Delete
    3. And Jean Robin is partly Jew. Some of his grand-parents were concentrated in Auschwitz, and even died. No precisions on the cause of death. Could be typhus or malnutrition.
      Malnutrition hitted European populations outside the camps too.

      Why did Germans bring the concentrated Jews in Germany as the Red Army was sweeping Poland ?
      They should have left the typhus-sick ones behind to spread the disease in the Red Army and in Soviet Union.

      Delete
  35. When these stories and photos continue being debunked it shows that the whole fairytale is nothing but lies. Did nothing happen? Of course not! That's absurd. Yes, these camps existed. We they cruel? Sure, all POW camps are filled with misery. But the stories being elevated to religion is also absurd.

    Since this photo has been hacked, that to me brings about a question as to whether this photo even shows Buchenwald. It is well known that much or most of the propaganda came from the Russian Bolsheviks (themselves jooz). How are we to know whether this photo is not of a Russian/Bolshevik Gulag and not a German camp at all?

    ReplyDelete
  36. Regarding Elie Wiesel, you may or may not be aware that according to his Wikipedia entry (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elie_Wiesel), Wiesel claims to be identifiably IN this picture. Caption to picture on Wikipedia: 'Wiesel is in the second row from the bottom, seventh from the left.'

    Presumably the veracity of this claim can be cross-checked?

    If his claim to be in the picture is upheld, he is an eye witness to the event recorded in this picture. Perhaps he can recall whether the man standing by the bunks was really there,or whether he, or another, were there but clothed and seated on the ground. At any rate, his comments would be highly interesting.

    By the way, if the naked man appears in another, different Buchenwald picture, it would be relevant to include it here as supporting evidence.

    ReplyDelete
  37. The 'Eric Hunt' link is 404

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Just replace the .info of the address with .com and it will work -

      http://forum.codoh.com/viewtopic.php?p=55957#p55957

      Delete
  38. also, this seems obsessive, but could you shoot a brief youtube video of flipping through the magazine? you don't have to talk. but it would disprove any allegations of photoshop on your part.

    ReplyDelete
  39. Nice find!
    I always thought there was something funny in this picture

    ReplyDelete
  40. In this picture:

    http://fotos.fotoflexer.com/dfac6a1c82ec4b6dc1411f452fbcab9b.jpg

    there is no annotation in the lower right corner. In the suspect picture we find "203647-s".

    Not very incremental but we should use as a basis for further questioning (there may be an honest answer, but at this point I don't trust ANYTHING they say.).

    ReplyDelete
  41. Upon the release of my my Great Uncle from Dachau, he said did not witness anything untoward to say the very least. Actually, on the contrary..he said the Jews that were put in supervisory roles were bastards....He was interned in this cam for 12/12 years.

    ReplyDelete
  42. Unclean????? LOL LOL..Irish are usually funny guys no?? What a drama queen.....!!!!!

    ReplyDelete
  43. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Yj1G7H7QRTg&list=PL5TU9FkGizU8jCqJIRTVdDbf0DvCEqmUs&index=11

    ReplyDelete
  44. Hi there, I'm posting from Italy. Compliments for this great investigation! I will make a translation of all into the italian language and then post it in several blogs here in Italy.
    Best regards!!
    Alessandro

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thank you very much Alessandro.

      Feel free to take anything you want from here, and use it to write your own article about it if you prefer.

      Here's some other connected things just in case you haven't seen them:
      http://winstonsmithministryoftruth.blogspot.co.uk/2013/05/doctored-buchenwald-photo-in-press.html
      http://winstonsmithministryoftruth.blogspot.co.uk/2013/01/is-there-3rd-version-of-buchenwald.html
      http://winstonsmithministryoftruth.blogspot.co.uk/2012/12/another-famous-holocaust-photo-is-fraud.html

      Good luck.

      Delete
  45. This proves that cameras were available in WW2 Germany. Which begs the question; how come there's no photos of any gas chambers or piles of bodies? How do you get rid of 6 million bodies? If they burnt them, why would they bother gassing them first? Why would you bother manhandling 6 million bodies from the gas chamber to the incinerator, when you could have them walk to the incinerator? This hollow hoax has more holes in it that Swiss cheese.

    ReplyDelete
  46. I'm still open to what you're saying, but a 'photoshopped' image does not a hoax make.

    To the individual above, Anonymous 15 July, there are indeed photos of gas chambers (they still exist-see Auschwitz), and piles of bodies are all over the internet.

    Also: when they say 6 million, not all of those were killed in concentration camps, it was death from all sources

    ReplyDelete
  47. Defending our Government is like eating green eggs and ham. I would not defend this government in a box, with a fox, whether it told a lie, or told the truth. Any person standing in defense of our Government is an idiot at best.

    ReplyDelete

Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.